G2Voice Broadcast #164 – Self Ownership Informed Consent
are Fundamental Rights of us ALL!
Sunday, Nov. 3rd
10 AM EST
(daylight savings time)
http://g2churchnews.org/ is a new site! Go there for ALL G2Church newsletters!
NOTE: Our newsletters are being blocked so signup with another e-mail
I use Protonmail.com It is FREE!
Last week’s G2Voice Broadcast
How Glyphosate can be broken down in the body with Chlorine Dioxide
Upcoming G2Church Seminars for 2020
Santa Marta, Colombia!
Feb. 15th-16th - English
Feb.22nd-23rd – Spanish
This will be our 62nd G2Church Seminar! Since our 59th seminar the WHOLE G2Church Seminar has changed! The G2Church Seminars are now covering topics such as:
We at the Genesis II Church of Health and Healing have been involved in one of the most comprehensive, worldwide, cross cultural broad spectrum voluntary human health studies of this world for the past 7 years. If you include Jim Humble and his studies in Africa, it has been almost 20 years. Ninety-five percent of the world's diseases have been treated with the Genesis II Church Protocols with great success. No monies were received from any pharmaceutical/medical companies wanting a certain result. The people of this world that have followed the G2C protocols have not been paid in anyway, but they have “self-dosed” themselves voluntarily. “Self-care” is what is being taught and encouraged by the Genesis II Church worldwide and it is working incredibly. Every person on this earth has the God-given right to control their own health and not rely on the pharmaceutical/medical industry. Archbishop Mark S. Grenon
Now, that’s scientific – Observation and Repeatability. That is why you’ll hear me say we are doing “clinical studies” all of the world with humans with our G2 Sacraments and seeing consistent results! Because that is exactly what we are doing, and I will show you testimonies and how to do it for YOURSELF!
This seminar answers questions like:
- What is the dis-ease?
- How does the body become dis-eased?
- How was the body’s Digestive System designed to work?
- Should you ASK YOUR DOCTOR anything about health or nutrition?
- Does the Liver NEED to be cleansed?
- Why is there so much Cancer in today’s world?
- How to “restore health” from various types dis-ease of the body?
- Are there testimonies of people restoring their health without a doctor?
- How can I be involved with “creating a world without dis-ease?
- As well as many more questions answered you NEED answered to live a healthy life in this toxic world!
Plan ahead for this seminar and hope to see many there and more importantly many there will know how to practice “self-care” for the rest of their lives!
The rooms are NOT included now but, lunch, Sat. and Sun. and snacks are included in the seminar cost of $300.00 US or 1,000,000 Colombian Pesos.
NOTE: The only EXRA cost is the cost of the hotel you choose for three nights!
There are 73 Lodgings in Rodadero. You choose where you want to stay. https://www.tripadvisor.com/Search?geo=294073&q=rodadero#&ssrc=h&o=0
Beautiful Rodadero, Colombia on the Caribbean Sea with the Sierra Nevada Mountains behind! Other places to visit while here:
We are looking forward to training more health ministers on how to use the G2 Sacramental Protocols. We are seeing so many testimonies coming in weekly from around the world using the G2Church Protocols correctly! People can take control of their own health without relying on the medical industry for the rest of their life! Of course, in case of an emergency you need a hospital's emergency ward, but day to day health can be achieved by:
- Detoxing the body with the G2 Sacraments of pathogens i.e. bad bacteri, bad viruses, bad overgrown fungi and molds, overgrown parasite population, heavy metals, cancers and oxidize other synthetic and artificial compounds causing dis-ease in the body!
- Minimizing and stopping all the toxins that are coming into the body including medications!
- Building up the body's internal complex and efficient defense systems that work in conjunction with the 13 systems of the body with naturally organic foods.
- Eliminating Stressful relationships and situations in your life!
Everyone that is planning on coming needs to buy their plane tickets to Santa Marta, Colombia. Rodadero is where the seminar will be held and is 20 minutes from Airport, (SMR). Those coming from US through Miami can save money by flying into Barranquilla, BRQ, and take a bus, 1 ½ hours directly from airport to Rodadero 10 mins from Santa Marta where the G2Seminar will be held. This should save you 300 US! The price of the seminar.
NOTE: Please register as soon as possible because this helps us to plan the seminar to run more efficiently.
We are looking forward to a great Genesis II Church Seminar in beautiful Rodadero, Colombia! Come and spend a few extra days relaxing before or after the G2 Seminar. There are a lot of things to see here from the mountains 30 minutes away to the Caribbean Sea and Tayrona park. Santa Marta is 10 minutes away and it is over 500 years old!
Let’s Change The World Together!
Bishop Mark S. Grenon
- Gum Disease / Heartburn I’d had gum pockets that were getting larger and a couple years ago had the expensive gum treatment my dentist provides. It worked but the problem returned recently. The dentist recommended a toothpaste with higher than normal fluoride, which in my opinion and research is not a safe thing to have in your body. The worst cavity prone period of my life I was using fluoride toothpaste and drinking fluoridated water. I recalled MMS, ordered, and this time I brushed with MMS once a day for a month even though it’s recommended to use twice a day, then I flossed, and I swished the remaining mixture as a mouthwash. It foams up when brushing which was a surprise. The day after the first treatment my gums were already pinker and the fuzzy feeling on my teeth was gone and has been since. I have the glassy smooth feeling on my teeth which I love. Went back to the dentist about 4 or 5 weeks later and the hygienist told me I’d had major healing and was surprised I’d made my own toothpaste. She actually printed the chart out that shows the pocket measurements for every tooth, and every single one had improvement and almost everyone was in the normal range for gum health after this short period. There are actually a couple brands of toothpaste that exist with the active ingredient, CD, if you want something premixed. Dioxibrite and Closys are two I looked at but haven’t tried. My one year old daughter was also teething, and she’d had a fever for four or five days and was just a miserable, sad sight. It would keep returning after several rounds of children’s ibuprofen which we didn’t want to risk overuse. She went to her pediatrician, but they said there is nothing they can do but wait it out. I just could not believe that. I gave her 1/4 of a drop, and the next day the fever was drastically reduced and gone the day after that. A friend of mine had a surprise case of heartburn so bad that he thought he may have been having a heart attack, and legitimately questioned whether he was dying. After he took some MMS it was completely gone and didn’t come back. More to come I’m sure. —B. USA
- Autism I have been suffering along with the neighbor’s autistic son’s horribly disturbing agitation, screaming, yelling, crying, banging, stomping and noisy insomnia for 4 years. Suddenly the child is 97% content and quiet. I found out that they are using MMS and bought some for myself. I am trialing it on my dogs skin condition by spraying topically and by dosing their drinking water. I have found it to be a perfect deodorant and tonight I got some flea bites from an infested basement area which were burning and stinging. This went away immediately after spraying with the 40 gtts / 4 ounces solution. WOW I am going to start oral dosing myself tomorrow. —H. Panama
- Best Natural Remedy Medical profession gave me no hope after acquiring hydrocephalus in an auto accident. I went from a nursing home invalid for two years to become a productive vibrant citizen. I now can drive, run, and live a normal life. MMS also cured deep vein thrombosis and cured me in 2 days of MRSA. God bless this work forever! —C.K.
- Colon Cancer My sister’s husband was diagnosed with colon cancer last year, and thanks to God and MMS he is fine right now. He is so grateful that he wants to be part of this blessing and pass it to many more. —L.B., USA
- Bleeding in the Eye I have a client here in Jamaica that has severe diabetes, 20 years on injections. She started taking MMS (6 drops in the morning and 6 drops at night), not even dropping them in her eye. She was scheduled for surgery and had to travel 3 hours to get to the hospital where she would have the surgery. She first went for consultation and the specialist said she definitely needed the surgery and urgently. Her eye looked like she had been punched in it. The sugar in the blood is like glass in the eye. That is what causes the bleeding. She was on the drops for a couple of weeks and her eye visibly started turning from blood red to pink and then to white (normal). She went to have the surgery and the doctor was shocked (to say the least) he said he didn’t understand how this happened but he sent her home and said she didn’t need the surgery again. —J.
- Fibromyalgia, H-Pylori — a stomach bacteria — was killed after only 2 capsules of MMS — 78% calcium hypochlorite powder — which made the use of traditional antibiotic 3 months protocol — totally unnecessary. Fibromyalgia was mostly gone — pain level difference — after 5 days of — same as above — calcium hypochlorite capsules — 3-4-4-5-5- per day for 5 days — amazing results — thank you Jim Humble. —R.R. HIV Infection I am very grateful about your gift of MMS to the world and to me because it has healed me completely from Hiv-infection. I use MMS now for over 2 years, with fullest satisfaction. I did the Hiv-test back in 1990 and was put on meds in ‘96 and I used them up until 2010. Because they were killing me I stopped taking them altogether. But then MMS came and ever since then I live a healthy life. I will go on using it as long as it is available. Thank you Jim Humble for all you did to me. —J.
- Lyme Success With MMS and MMS2 I am writing to declare the success I am having using MMS to defeat my Lyme disease. I contracted Lyme 2 years ago from an insect bite. At the time i was bitten, i knew nothing about Lyme disease. Since being bit, I started to get weird things happening to my body. Little did I know that they were all symptoms of Lyme. I am a fairly healthy person, so it took a while before it got a strong hold on my immune system. Last March I got what I thought was the flu. It was the worst flu I had ever gotten in my life. I hurt from every pore of my body. I began to take echinacea, but it didn’t help. Since I had MMS in the house I decided to give it a try. Well that did the trick! I felt well again within a short time. I stopped taking it since I seemed to be back to my old self. After a couple of days, the symptoms came back and that’s when I realized that I was dealing with some other illness and not the flu. It took a lot of investigative work to discover that I had Lyme disease. My medical doctor was absolutely no help at all. In fact she was a hindrance. I went online and used a symptom checker and it indicated I probably had MS or Lyme. Since the MMS was helping, I began using it again, and researched as much as I could on how to treat my symptoms. I began protocol 2000. I also contacted a naturopathic doctor in my city for support. To my great surprise, she supported using MMS. She recommended using MMS in an enema which helped a lot. I am using MMS2 as well. Both protocols work well together. If it were not for MMS I believe I would be in the hospital fighting for my life right now. My symptoms were severe and the pain was horrible. MMS is a miracle in my opinion! —B.B.
- MMS Works, MRSA Has Not Returned Please do not listen to the false unproven claims of the negative claims of the naysayers concerning MMS. Last year I came down with MRSA which the medical establishment finds very difficult to treat since many antibiotics have lost their effectiveness against this disease. I chose to try MMS to treat my MRSA. My sores started to dry up right away and I was completely healed in one week. I’m telling you that IT WORKS! I did not get sick at all when taking it. MRSA has not returned A.
- Morgellons I tell you it was a miracle how I got MMS in my hands, I was suffering with what I believe now to be Morgellons. My doctor told me, I know what is it, I can’t diagnose it and I can’t treat it and walked out of the room. I also had been fighting candida for years with nothing working it would get better and come back. My daughter had asked me to find a product that had helped her with a heath issue, I found a product I thought was what she wanted. Soon I received an email saying my MMS was being shipped. I said “what is MMS”? I researched MMS I could not believe what I was seeing it was exactly what I needed for the symptoms I was having. I started the protocol almost immediately the sores and itching was getting better. Today the Morgellons and candida are gone. I have gone to iridologist and when she saw me she said my goodness “I have never seen anyone heal like that, what did you do” I told her how I got the MMS she said you need to write that down and share it with others who may be suffering with Morgellons. I am alive and healthy today because of MMS. I was contemplating suicide because of the pain and itching and the inability to sleep for a year prior to finding this wonderful product. I thank God for his provisions for his people. I believe God let me stumble onto an inexpensive product that would heal my body. Thank you Jim Humble for being willing to stand up...to inform people that we don’t have to depend on pharmaceuticals to be healthy. —J.S.
- Cancer and Asthma Cured I want to testify to the fact that I treated my mum who had colon cancer stage 3 with MMS and she’s now totally free of it in just 3 months. Also, my son has been suffering from asthma since when he was about 3 months old and now after doing the nebulizer therapy, he’s free from it. For about 2 years now, he has not had any attack. —B. Prostate Cancer — PSA Gone Down I was told that I had prostate cancer and that my P.S.A. reading was 16 where the normal reading is between zero and four, after just 6 weeks of MMS my P.S.A. reading had gone down and my doctor was amazed at the improvement. Other benefits of MMS are hair and nail growth, also my little injuries seemed to heal much quicker than normal. I would recommend you give MMS a try. —K.G., Spain
A review from Dr. Leonard Horowitz
April 15, 2019
“Imagine a World Without Disease. Is it Possible? is an outstanding compilation of enlightening facts that Divine justice calls into question at these urgent ‘End Times.’ Civilization is now threatened with extinction by corporate fascists, government officials, and their minions of so-called science experts in ‘healthcare’ and biological warfare. Their damage demonstrates their criminal psychopathology, demonic possession, and unGodly impositions. These Deep State stewards of profitable depopulation, geopolitical and economic chaos, and human misery have a karmic destiny that is inescapable. Mark S. Grenon puts a nail in their coffin with this life-saving labor of love. I especially recommend his book for people awakening from their hypno-tronic trance states into the real world of physical salvation and spiritual restoration.”
Review by Dr. Leonard Horowitz
See our interview with Dr. Leonard Horwitz
Read the FREE eBook here:
Documental de la Iglesia Génesis II (Subtitulado en 10 idiomas): http://quantumleap.is
Curso en español: https://g2iglesiavideocurso.g2sacraments.org
Testimonios de MMS:
- Videos: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/O5jRqvWWOdnB/
- Escritos: https://iglesiagenesis2.org/testimonios
Libro electrónico parcial gratuito (ENG, ESP)https://g2churchbooks.org/Imagina-Un-Mundo-Sin-MAL-ESTAR-ebook-Parcial-Gratuito-p119513151
Suscripción al boletín de la Iglesia Génesis II: https://iglesiagenesis2.org/
Curso de Video: Haz Clic
Sitio web de G2Voice: https://g2voice.is/
To stay healthy in this toxic world, do the following while you can.
What you can do!
1. Get our G2Church Documentary to the world!
2. Get this book and read it!
Read the Free Partial book:
NOTE: If you think the information can help you then buy the complete book at:
“Imagine, A World Without DIS-EASE Is it Possible?
NOTE: 100% of the proceeds go to the Genesis II Church of Health and Healing
3. Listen to the G2Voice each week!
Audio - www.G2voice.is
NOW we have each week’s VIDEO of G2Voice Broadcast on:
1. Video: www.g2voice.is
3. Video: www.bitchute.com/channel/g2church/
4. Video: mewe.com/group/5c8ce8d58c46b81cf704f80c
4. Get the Online course and study it for you and your family and take the exam and become a Health Minister and open a G2Church Chapter!
Learn how to make the G2Sacraments in your home so no one can hinder you getting the Sacraments!: https://g2churchvideocourse.org/
Here is where we are located now. If anyone needs help, please feel free to contact us!
- Contact e-mails:
- To keep up with the latest news please signup for our FREE weekly G2Church Newsletter at:
2. mmsnews.org for all past newsletters!
NOTE: Help us fight back by sending our Newsletter link to family and friends!
Our weekly G2Voice Broadcast (Facebook Alternatives!
1. G2Voice Broadcast Website: g2voice.is (AUDIO & VIDEO!)
2. brighteon.com/channel/g2church UNCENSORED (VIDEO)
3. https://www.bitchute.com/channel/g2church/ UNCENSORED (VIDEO)
4. mewe.com/group/5c8ce8d58c46b81cf704f80c (VIDEO)
5. G2Voice Telegram Channel: UNCENSORED https://t.me/G2Voice (VIDEO)
G2 Sacramental Protocol Videos:
(Starting Procedure to Protocol 2000)
NOTE: ALWAYS START WITH STARTING PROCEDURE!
MMS Video Testimonies:
Take Your G2Sacraments on the road with you!
Keeping the G2Church Sacraments with you at all times is a must in this TOXIC world. It is getting worse every day especially with the poisons found in medications , processed foods and being sprayed in the air on the heavily populated areas of the world! From purifying the water you drink to dealing with allergic reactions from toxins or just daily detoxing the body, the G2Sacraments can keep you healthy in an unhealthy world! We at the G2Church are working hard to keep the donations for our sacraments as inexpensive as possible while other providers are charging double in many cases! There are three main reasons to obtain your sacraments from us:
1. We ensure that your sacraments are prepared correctly which effects the results! We have tested many of the so-called providers and found the solutions to be weak and NOT as effective!
2. We can help guide you with the Sacramental protocols whereas others may or may not know how to use the protocols and are only providing products that might not even be made correctly!
3. We try to keep the donation for the basic kits at around $20 US.
NOTE: The donations received by the G2Church go into helping others around the world!
Many people ask us about carrying G2Church Sacraments while traveling. Well, now you can have them with you all the time with the NEW G2Church Travel Kit! The bottle sizes are small enough to carry on the plane with you!
G2Voice Broadcast # 164 – Self Ownership Informed Consent
are Fundamental Rights of us ALL!
I was informed a few weeks ago about a member of our G2Church in Brazil who had two children vaccinated without his permission while he was at work! The local medical industry was trying to get him to vaccinate his children and he refused! He denied having his children vaccinated due to what he knew was in them and the stated side affects mentioned in the “vaccine inserts” each vaccine has but many don’t know about it. The reason they don’t know about it is because the doctors and the pharmacies never tell them!
So, “they” took his children and injected poisons into them! How can this be? The children don’t know what was in the vaccines and they never chose these vaccines either. How can a government agency do such a thing without informed consent from those who have the power to make that decision in this case the father?
"Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness" is a well-known phrase in the United States Declaration of Independence. The phrase gives three examples of the "unalienable rights" which the Declaration says have been given to all humans by their Creator, and which governments are created to protect. Why not protection in this case for the children? Why are governments hell-bent on vaccinating everyone? Herd immunity is not accomplished by vaccinations.
Herd immunity is a lie to market VACCINES!
What is “Herd Immunity”? It is VERY important that you know what “they” mean when “they” say herd immunity. They mean “VACCINE HERD Immunity” or the ability of vaccines to give a group of people immunity from a certain disease. Does that sound right? They are saying that NATURAL Herd Immunity is the same as “vaccine induced herd immunity”. NATURAL “herd immunity” which NATURALLY occurs when someone or a group of people naturally contract an illness and the BODY produces what it needs to destroy the illness for the rest of the life of the body! VACCINE INDUCED Immunity, in theory, is when 95-100% of a group of people are vaccinated then that group will receive a lifetime immunity from further infection of a certain illness. Is that the same? Is it true? Watch the following videos:
Herd immunity is a lie to market VACCINES! https://www.brighteon.com/5849419502001
VIDEO The HighWire with Del Bigtree The Herd Immunity Myth https://www.brighteon.com/5825572637001
VIDEO: Vaccination Destroys Natural Herd Immunity and Weakens The Population - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vlqyj_uyzBc
·VIDEO: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mX6aCSGdh9Q: Today's Medical Establishment Lie About Herd immunity
·VIDEO :Herd Immunity is false: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NcRB0j-sZH4
·VIDEO: Dr. Mercola and Barbara Loe Fisher - Herd Immunity: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TFWBelim1Hw to 5:52
- Herd Immunity myth: https://www.thehealthyhomeeconomist.com/the-herd-immunity-myth-and-how-it-pits-parent-against-parent/
- Herd Immunity: The Foundational Lie of the Forced Vaccination Agenda, Part One: https://www.michaelgaeta.com/blog/2017/10/20/herd-immunity-the-foundational-lie-of-the-forced-vaccination-agenda-part-one
- Why the Herd Immunity Theory is a Lie: https://www.kitchenstewardship.com/herd-immunity-theory-lie/
Self-ownership, also known as sovereignty of the individual or individual sovereignty, is the concept of property in one's own person, expressed as the moral or natural right of a person to have bodily integrity and be the exclusive controller of one's own body and life. Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-ownership
NOTE: Even after the Lord bought and paid for those that accept His sacrifice, Paul, the apostle stated that we are in control of this temple and need to keep it from of being defiled!
“ What? know ye not that your body is the temple of the Holy Ghost which is in you, which ye have of God, and ye are not your own? For ye are bought with a price: therefore, glorify God in your body, and in your spirit, which are God's.”, 1 Corinthians 6:19-20 King James Version (KJV)
“Know ye not that ye are the temple of God, and that the Spirit of God dwelleth in you? If any man defile the temple of God, him shall God destroy; for the temple of God is holy, which temple ye are.”, I Corinthians 3:16 & 17
Ralph Fucetola did a good job explaining what LAWFULLY “informed consent” is and I wanted to share with
General Brief on Behalf of Informed Consent – Ralph Fucitols JD
Informed Consent is a Fundamental Human Right Protected Against Diminishment Through Legislative and Administrative Agency Denial of Philosophical or Religious Conscientious Objections to Mandated Vaccination. Informed Consent is Separate from Statutory Exemptions and May Not Be Abolished. The Right to Informed Consent is Meaningless Without the Right to Refuse Any Medical Intervention, Including Vaccination.
In order to vindicate International Humanitarian Law regarding Informed Consent to any and all medical interventions, including vaccination, even during any declared local, national or international Health Emergency, the right to refuse any vaccination must be respected, whether that refusal is grounded in philosophical, medical, religious or no reasons at all.
Point One: The Bill of Rights’ Speech, Privacy and Association Rights are the Basis for Informed Consent.
Implementing the general law as applied to the protection of human life is mandated, in the instance of vaccination, by the United States Supreme Court, which held that the courts “are not without power…” regarding vaccination in the case of Jacobson vs Commonwealth of Massachusetts . In 1914, Judge (later Supreme Court Justice) Benjamin Cardozo validated the concept of voluntary consent when he noted that every human being has a right to decide what shall be done with his or her body, deeming medical intervention without Informed Consent an unlawful trespass:
“Every human being of adult years and sound mind has a right to determine what shall be done with his own body; and a surgeon who performs an operation without his patient’s consent commits an assault for which he is liable in damages.”
Federal Regulation acknowledges Informed Consent for formal Institutional Review Board (IRB – required for FDA approved medical experiments) overseeing experimentation. The recognition of the application of Informed Consent during the less formal “final stage” of experimentation on drugs (including vaccines) released to the public is not adequately implemented by law or regulation, “…Phase 4 trials are conducted after a product is already approved and on the market to find out more about the treatment’s long-term risks…” . With regard to all communications about health care decisions, the members of the public have the right to make informed consent decisions, even if a decision may be considered a “bad” decision by the Government. The Supreme Court indicated, in Thompson v Western States:
“We have previously rejected the notion that the Government has an interest in preventing the dissemination of truthful commercial information in order to prevent members of the public from making bad decisions with the information.” . The United States is bound to observe the Nuremberg Code by virtue of the Subsequent Nuremberg Trials and subsequent exacting of justice through penalties, including the death penalty. The Geneva Conventions (the international treaties that govern humanitarian requirements)  require that the United States be bound by these international humanitarian principles. Thus the United States is treaty-bound to implement fully Informed Consent.
Even in an emergency situation the Government Agencies involved must take a pro-active role in the full implementation of Informed Consent without “the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion…”
The public has a right to know, and the governments on the federal and state levels have an obligation to provide, clear information regarding the Informed Consent, to the end that government approvals, requirements, mandates and recommendations are understood to be subject to the Right of Informed Consent. Intervention by the courts must vindicate this Right.
Point Two: Legitimate Government Regulation
Government Agencies have No Legitimate Interest in Promoting FDA-Approved Vaccination Mandates in Violation of Informed Consent.
In the case of State v Biggs (46 SE Reporter 401, 1903) the North Carolina Supreme Court dealt with a person who was advising people as to diet, and administering massage, baths and physical culture. In the Biggs case, the defendant “advertised himself as a ‘nonmedical physician’… [and] held himself out to the public to cure disease by ‘a system of drugless healing’…” p.401.
That Court held that there could be no “state system of healing” p.402 and while “Those who wish to be treated by practitioners of medicine and surgery had the guaranty that such practitioners had been duly examined… those who had faith in treatment by methods not included in the ‘practice of medicine and surgery’ as usually understood, had reserved to them the right to practice their faith and be treated, if they chose, by those who openly and avowedly did not use either surgery or drugs in the treatment of diseases…” p.402.
There is no compelling government interest in controlling people associating together for the improvement of their well-being.
The North Carolina Supreme Court concluded, nearly a century ago in State v Biggs, supra., at p.405:
“Medicine is an experimental, not an exact science. All the law can do is to regulate and safeguard the use of powerful and dangerous remedies, like the knife and drugs, but it cannot forbid dispensing with them. When the Master, who was himself called the Good Physician, was told that other than his followers were casting out devils and curing diseases, he said, ‘Forbid them not.‘” (p.405).
FDA approved drugs, including vaccines, remain in an experimental state, which the FDA calls “Phase 4” of the clinical trials system.
Unless affirmatively and effectively asserted an individual’s Fundamental Right to Informed Consent, the legal ability to resist unwanted medical interventions, such as vaccines and other invasive techniques, may be ignored by the medical system under government directive. Based on the ancient legal principle that “silence is acquiescence” martial law or medical emergency authorities may presume that you consent to even experimental medical interventions, as we saw imposed by WHO dictum during the 2014 Ebola Panic. The same is true of medical practice in “ordinary times”.
After the horrors of the Second World War, including the murder and abuse of millions with the complicity of the “health care” authorities of various warring parties, the international community developed conventions and declarations to the end that “Never Again!” would – or could – the health system or health professionals be used to harm either individuals or whole populations. Those prohibitions and protections remain binding today.
A key element in the international protections secured by the Allied Victory and subsequent codification of health-related international law was recognition that no person could be forced to accept any medical intervention that was contrary to conscience and that all medical interventions were to be carried out only with fully informed [and therefore meaningfully willing] consent.
This has been international law for millennia, starting with the Hippocratic Oath in which doctors swore “I will take care that [my patients] suffer no hurt or damage” and
“Nor shall any man’s entreaty prevail upon me to administer poison to anyone…”
Point Three: International Law Protects the Right of Informed Consent
Among the Post World War II protective codifications were the Universal Declaration of Rights, Geneva Declarationand the Nuremberg Code which state, concerning the rights of all human beings and the obligation for ethical action by health personnel:
“Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person… No one shall be subjected to … inhuman or degrading treatment … Everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights… No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence…”
“I WILL NOT USE my medical knowledge to violate human rights and civil liberties, even under threat…”
“The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved, as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision.”
This salutary development of international law has continued with international standards promulgated, such as the UNESCO Universal Bioethics Declaration  about which it has been said:
Even apart from article 7 of the ICCPR, ethical requirements for informed consent before medical or scientific treatment probably constitute international law as involving “general principles of law” under article 38 (1) (c) of the Statute of the International Court of Justice. The reference to “civilised nations” in this context could well introduce an ethical requirement to such evaluations that many contemporary developed nations may fail.
Defining Informed Consent
“Informed consent is a process for getting permission before conducting a healthcare intervention on a person… In the United Kingdom and countries such as Malaysia and Singapore, informed consent in medical procedures requires proof as to the standard of care to expect as a recognized standard of acceptable professional practice (the Bolam Test), that is, what risks would a medical professional usually disclose in the circumstances (see Loss of right in English law). Arguably, this is “sufficient consent” rather than “informed consent.” … Medicine in the United States, Australia, and Canada take a more patient-centric approach to “‘informed consent.’” Informed consent in these jurisdictions requires doctors to disclose significant risks, as well as risks of particular importance to that patient. This approach combines an objective (the reasonable patient) and subjective (this particular patient) approach.”
.Point Four: The Right Must Be Asserted to Be Preserved
Where there is no recognition of the legal duty to obtain informed consent, the individual or guardian must assert the Right or it may unlawfully assumed or deemed to have been waived. International Humanitarian Law is clear: without clear, affirmative, memorialized informed consent, it must be concluded that Informed Consent has been withheld.
The essential importance of asserting the Right to preserve it is shown by the 2013 US Supreme Court case of Missouri vs McNeely, where the warrantless extraction of blood was ruled illegal as the defendant “refused to consent.” Had McNeely remained silent, the blood test would have been allowed.
.The Court opined,
Even a “…diminished expectation of privacy does not diminish the… privacy interest in preventing a government agent from piercing the… skin. And though a blood test conducted in a medical setting by trained personnel is less intrusive than other bodily invasions, this Court has never retreated from its recognition that any compelled intrusion into the human body implicates significant, constitutionally protected privacy interests…” (page 15; emphasis added).
If the removal of blood “implicates significant, constitutionally protected privacy interests…” it is fair to assume that other invasive medical techniques including the introduction of vaccine toxins into the body that have been held to be “unavoidably unsafe” will also give rise to such concerns.
The Constitution of the United States recognizes certain Rights held by people and delegates certain limited Powers to the government. Without clear respect for those Rights, the judicial system and the administration of government will fail to protect the truly fundamental interests of civil society, including the Right to Informed Consent.
An earlier Supreme Court understood this, when in 1905 in Jacobson v Massachusetts, the Court declared the judicial power to extend to protecting people from forced vaccination.
While giving due deference to the State authorities, the Supreme Court reserved for the Federal Courts the right to intervene in matters where health and life may be at stake:
“…if it be apparent or can be shown with reasonable certainty that he is not at the time a fit subject of vaccination or that vaccination, by reason of his then condition, would seriously impair his health or probably cause his death.” [Emphasis added.]
In a regime of verbal obfuscation of fundamental Right, only the clear assertion of the Right will prevent degradation of the Right “by a thousand (bureaucratic) cuts…” If McNeely had not engaged in protected speech stating he did not consent, the taking of his blood would probably have been allowed.
The question then becomes, “How is one to effectively assert the Right to Informed Consent, enshrined in International Humanitarian Law, for oneself and those over whom one has guardianship?” Thus, there is a need for strong Statutory and Regulatory protections for the Right, whether exercised by Advanced Medical Directive or otherwise, in situations that do not involve a formal IRB.
Access to the AVD Card Here: http://drrimatruthreports.com/advancevaccinedirective
Regulatory Petition to FDA Here: http://tinyurl.com/InformedConsentPetition
Model Protective Law Here: http://tinyurl.com/InformedConsentProtection
Point Five: Government Action Imposes an Unconstitutional Condition
on the Constitutionally Protected Right to Informed Consent
The well-established law of Unconstitutional Conditions has particular relevance in the case before any Court wherein a party is faced with the harsh choice of vaccinating the child or having the child banned from the public benefit of public education, required by law for all children. Any law, regulation or policy imposing school vaccine mandates where the parent is faced with denying his or her own expressed beliefs or preferences (beliefs thereby protected under the First Amendment) or denying the child access to public education, is an action “under color of law” that forces coerced consent..
This is precisely the type of duress condemned by the Nuremberg Code.
It is also clearly conditioning the acceptance of a public benefit on the surrender of a right.
The law of Unconstitutional Conditions is well-represented in the jurisprudence of the United States Supreme Court and the Courts it oversees.
We do not pretend to more expertise on the issue than the Court’s own pronouncements.
The Supreme Court first mentions the phrase in Doyle v. Continental Ins. Co., 94 U.S. 535, 543 (1876) (Badley, J., dissenting) “Though the State may have the [police] power… it has no power to impose unconstitutional conditions…”
In Frost v Railroad Commission, 271 U.S. 583,594 (1925) the Court held it “would be a palpable incongruity to strike down an act of state legislation which, by words of express divestment seeks to strip the citizen of rights guaranteed by the federal Constitution, but to uphold an act by which the same result is accomplished under the guise of a surrender of a right in exchange for a valuable privilege which the state threatens otherwise to withhold… it may not impose conditions which require the relinquishment of constitutional rights.”
More recently the Court applied the principle to First Amendment speech rights arising from expressive association issues directly in point here where First Amendment protected religious expressive association is involved. In Speiser v Randall, 357 U.S. 513, 526 (1958)
“In practical operation, therefore, this procedural device must necessarily produce a result the State could not command directly. It can only result in a deterrence of speech which the Constitution makes free.”
And finally, of particular note is the statement in Perry v Sindermann, 408 U.S. 593, 597 (1972):
“…this court has made it clear that even though a person has no ‘right’ to a valuable governmental benefit and even though the government may deny him the benefit for any number of reasons, there are some reasons upon which the government may not rely. It may not deny a benefit to a person on a basis that infringes his constitutionally protected interests – especially, his interest in freedom of speech. For if the government could deny a benefit to a person because of his constitutionally protected speech or associations, his exercise of those freedoms would in effect be penalized and inhibited. This would allow the government to “produce a result which (it) could not command directly.”
It was not for no reason that the Founders grouped together in the First Amendment Religious Liberty, Speech, Assembly and Petition Rights. Rather, these stated Rights have been held by the Supreme Court to be, together, “expressive association.”
We consider meaningful Informed Consent to be the sine qua non of humane health care required by International Humanitarian Law. Truly, no free person should be forced to consent to mandated medical interventions.
There can hardly be a more fundamental or central freedom issue than whether agents of government, or persons acting under color of state law, as are those who act to abrogate conscientious objections to mandated vaccines, can force a free and competent adult (or a child under the protection of such adult) to receive any medical treatment. That the treatment may be vaccination, which is not merely experimental and (sic) preventative but uninsurable and, according to many courts, “unavoidably unsafe” gives greater emphasis to the unconscionable personal sacrifice the individual is mandated to make. Such a mandate is inconsistent with status as a free person, rather than a slave. No free society can tolerate any such imposition.
“Liberty is to the collective body what health is to every individual body. Without health no pleasure can be tasted by man; without liberty, no happiness can be enjoyed by society.” – Thomas Jefferson
Ralph Fucetola JD
Attorney at Law in New Jersey
1971 – 2006
Informed Consent FAQs: http://drrimatruthreports.com/advance-vaccine-directive-card-faqs/
Law Note on Informed Consent and the Geneva Conventions:
PS: I’d like to recommend Mary Holland’s spirited defense of Informed Consent here:
Some updates to this information here:
 Jacobson v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905)
 Schloendorff v. Society of New York Hosp.,105 N.E. 92, 93 (N.Y. 1914)
 Thompson v. Western States Medical Center – 01-344, decided on April 29, 2002 – 535 U.S. 357)
 “Phase 4 trials are conducted after a product is already approved and on the market to find out more about the treatment’s long-term risks, benefits, and optimal use, or to test the product in different populations of people, such as children.”
Downloaded July 8, 2015: http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/ResourcesForYou/Consumers/ucm143531.htm
 “qui tacet consentire videtur” – “Thus, silence gives consent.” Sometimes accompanied by the proviso “ubi loqui debuit ac potuit“, that is, “when he ought to have spoken and was able to”. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Latin_phrases_%28Q%29
 The Geneva Conventions comprise four treaties,and three additional protocols, that establish the standards of international law for thehumanitarian treatment of war. The singular term Geneva Convention usually denotes the
agreements of 1949, negotiated in the aftermath of the Second World War (1939–45), which updated the terms of the first three treaties (1864, 1906, 1929), and added a fourth. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geneva_Conventions
 http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=31058&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html which provides: Article 6 – Consent –1. Any preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned, based on adequate information. The consent should, where appropriate, be express and may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason without disadvantage or prejudice. 2. Scientific research should only be carried out with the prior, free, express and informed consent of the person concerned. The information should be adequate, provided in a comprehensible form and should include modalities for withdrawal of consent. Consent may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason without any disadvantage or prejudice. Exceptions to this principle should be made only in accordance with ethical and legal standards adopted by States, consistent with the principles and provisions set out in this Declaration, in particular in Article 27, and international human rights law. Article 28 – Nothing in this Declaration may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any claim to engage in any activity or to perform any act contrary to human rights, fundamental freedoms and human dignity… [Emphasis added]
 Missouri vs McNeely, 569 US _ (2013) http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/11-1425_cb8e.pdf –https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Missouri_v._McNeely
 See Justice Sotomayor’s 2011 dissent in Bruesewitz vs Wyeth, where she discusses the history of “unavoidably unsafe.”https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/09-152.ZD.html
 Jacobson v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905)
Format VideoPosted on August 11, 2016Author VaxCSCategories 14th Amendment, COUNTRIES, EDUCATION, HELP, Informed Consent, INFORMED CONSENT, INFORMED CONSENT, INFORMED CONSENT, Lawyers, LEGAL, MARY HOLLAND, NON_CONSENT, REPUBLIC, Rima E. Laibow, M.D., VIDEO
Tune in Sunday, Nov. 3rd, 2019
10 AM EST
Let’s change the world together
Bishop Mark S. Grenon
- Mark Grenon